Friday, November 9, 2018

Widows, Women and others. Reflection for 11th November 2018


Widows, Women, and Others:

I often hear people say, “Oh how wonderful to have been born in the Victorian era”… or some other bygone era and they ask me what era I would like to have been born in….  My answer is this one right now with air-conditioning and flushing toilets thank you very much. 
And along with our technological advancements, of which I’m appreciative, I’m also appreciative of the rights that women have and the move towards some kind of equality.  Now don’t get me wrong, I’ve not ever been called a feminist, but I surely have cried over some inequalities and the readings today touch on some pretty sensitive topics for me.

Our readings this week speak of three widows.  Two are in the first reading, Naomi and Ruth, who lived many generations before the birth of Christ.  The third widow is the one who put her two measly coins (all that she had to live on) into the treasury.

While the plight of women today is still in a state of striving for justice, women in Biblical times were generally treated as beings of little consequence other than a necessity for child bearing, Widows were particularly susceptible to all the dangers of life.

In the time of the Scribes in the Gospel, the customs were such that the person who knew the most about God’s law was the person most respected.  This is why they were greeted with honour and give the best seats etc.  It was also considered a shameful thing to jeopardize your social status.  Therefore, the widow who put in all she had to live on, actually did a shameful thing… because she is completely jeopardizing her status & ability to care for herself. However, she was caught between a rock and a hard place because it would have also been dishonourable to not give to the temple.  And THIS is how the Scribes devoured widows’ houses, because they took from these poor women, but did nothing to support them.   
Ahhhh… but this would never happen in our generation would it?
I actually know of a lady who only about a year ago told me how in her early days of marriage, used to go without lunch at work so that she could put the money she saved into the collection at church.  I’m guessing her husband wasn’t a church man and I’m also guessing that her story is not as unique as we might wish.  That lady eventually divorced, in an era when divorce was very much a scandal – especially in the Church.  She is still one of the most giving and generous ladies I know. 
Would we have labelled her divorce as scandalous?
Have you ever been in that kind predicament like our Biblical widow, where it was a no win situation?

In education training we learnt about Maslow’s hierarchy of needs.  A smart cookie who came up with a way of describing what all humans need in the shape of a pyramid.  It explains that people need physical needs met before they can go on to have other needs met, but it is also an acknowledgement that human needs are more than merely physical.  After the basic physical need of food, water and shelter is the need for security and safety… then the need for love and belonging, after that the need for esteem, followed by the need for purpose and meaning and then self actualization.  I’m reminded of a story I’ve heard about an experiment with babies who were given the basics but not love… not held.  The experiment was cut short when the babies began to die….  While we might think that the basics are all that people need, this might cause us to think again.
Related image

While these Scribes were busy making a show of themselves with long prayers and honourable seats, there were widows who were supporting the scribes by their giving, who didn’t have their basic needs for living, and these means for living were being happily accepted by the scribes to enable them to ensure their own status.

Last week we had the story of Ruth and Naomi, and this week the story continues and I hope that with this understanding of the widows’ predicament you will appreciate the precarious position of Naomi and Ruth.

Ruth happened to be gleaning barley in the fields of one of Naomi’s husband’s relatives- the term used is “Kinsmen Redeemer”.  In God’s law there were many ways that acknowledged and cared for the poor.  One was with the idea of the Kinsmen redeemer, which means that if a man dies then his brother or closest relative should take the widow as his wife in the hope that a son will be born who will take on the name of the husband who has died – but also, most importantly, to care for the widow. 
Also in the law was this idea of gleaning the fields.  The parts of the harvest which missed the initial collection was to be left in the fields and were to remain there for the widows and the poor of the land.  Ruth had spent the season gleaning and all had gone extremely well, but the harvest was done and the winter was coming.

Naomi hatched a plan – it was dangerous, it was desperate and potentially scandalous. But let me tell you about scandal; many generations prior, the ancestor of Boaz, a lady by the name of Tamar, was almost burned to death for a similar deception where she dressed as a prostitute because her father-in-law had failed to give his son as her kinsmen Redeemer.  When all was revealed she was proclaimed as being more honourable for the action she took – likewise was to be the outcome with our Ruth.

Ruth dressed up and went in secret to the place where the men partied…. Kind of like the traditional cane cut out party, but then take it up a notch.  Lots of festivities would have included wine and possibly even prostitutes – certainly it was a man’s affair. 
Ruth noted where Boaz lay down for sleep and lay down at his feet.  Would we have labelled it scandalous?  We would have, which is why Boaz said to not let it be known that a woman came to the threshing floor.  But wait, he also praised Ruth for her faithfulness in requesting a relationship with him, rather than running after someone younger.

While outsiders may have gossiped and made this event into something scandalous, these people were faithful and honourable.  Boaz promised to communicate with the closer relative to see if he wanted to take Ruth as his wife, and if not she would certainly become Boaz’s wife.

Lives were put on the line because lives depended on it.  All was given, all was surrendered in the hope of something better.

Just as lives were put on the line, Jesus freely surrendered his own life as a sacrifice to remove sin.   It’s crazy stuff… it is dangerous – what if the people he died for didn’t receive the gift he was giving?   What if they didn’t understand and kept distant from God because of their sin?????  Oh and this does happen – anyone who has ever said that they can’t set foot in a church in case the roof falls in is expressing their “badness” in comparison to God’s goodness, and not understanding that Jesus has removed sin.  Which sin?  Was it the sin in the past or the present or the future?   Hebrews tells us that this was done once and for all.  The implication is that all is paid.

To the people who were looking on the events that we read about, on the outside these events look scandalous.  On the outside, here and now, there are many things we might think of as being scandalous about other people.  I love the saying, believe only half of what you see and none of what you hear.  We pretty much never get it right from the outside, but need to remember Ruth – labelled as faithful, kind and honourable, maybe if we understood God’s perspective on supposed scandals we might find those who are generally devoured with unkind words and whispers, are actually more honourable than we are.

We have God’s law written in our hearts and minds and we may be those with respect, but like the Scribes, if we make judgments on others, we have the potential to devour others who are just trying their best to live, giving all that they have to live on, while we make ourselves feel superior by adding to the rumours.

Jesus was most harsh with the religious of his day, but if we don’t examine ourselves applying the same measure – as we are the religious of this day, we risk making the same mistakes as those scribes.

Jesus laid down his life to remove sins.  Love covers a multitude of sin.  The love of God, and his mercy in our own lives, should move us to, like Jesus, stand beside those who’ve been judged as lesser.  God’s heart breaks for the broken and the broken hearted, for those labelled or treated as less.  

As the hands and feet of God we need to be heartbroken for them too and stand alongside. We have a choice; be a modern day scribe- who keeps the law, makes a show of being a righteous person and devour people by our judgments, or live like Jesus, putting our own life on the line to show love to others.  On the flip side, we may feel like Ruth, Naomi and the widow, we may not feel we have anything physical, emotional and spiritual left to give, but keep going –  God cares for the broken and God’s favour rests on you.

Sunday, November 4, 2018

Reflecting on readings for the 3rd November 2018 Some women of Significance.


GOD IS GOOD – ALL THE TIME!
I have heard some people say this recently like a catch phrase… so I did a google search and found a song that starts with the preacher/ singer stating, “God is good”  and the people replied, “All the time”…. And they went on and then he said, “All the time” and the people replied “God is Good”.
What is your response when you hear this?
I have a confession….  My response is not so immediately enthusiastic.  While I give intellectual assent, my heart is sending messages that oppose and saying, yes but remember how things have gone wrong in your life…. Remember how just when it got good it got taken away....   I wonder if you are also in this kind of inner tug-of-war.

Many years ago in the time something BC.  There was an Ephrathite family, (that is, they were from Bethlehem), and there was famine in the land.  So they moved.  They went to the land of Moab and settled, but the Man of the house died.  His two sons married Moabite women, but the sons then also died, leaving the mother with two daughter-in-laws.  All this was within 10 years.

Naomi was the mother and she was a devout woman of God, but with all that had happened she logically concluded, “God has turned His hand against me”. 

God is good – ALL THE TIME.  But sometimes it seems that God has turned his hand against me.  Is it my sinfulness that has brought about this hand of God?  These are the questions that naturally arise.
In recent weeks we have had readings from the book of Job and almost more than anything, I think the Bible deals with this question….  Why do bad things happen?  Is it because of something bad I have done?  Does God hate me?  Is he trying to hurt me?  IS HE GOOD?   God is good….all the time?

It is natural to believe in cause and effect… for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction…  Therefore when we see something bad happen we look for the reason and make conclusions like, God’s hand is against me. 
Apparently the New Orleans disaster had two different views from Christian people – one said God was punishing the people for their great sin, the other said that God was showing mercy such that though there was a natural disaster, people were saved.  I’m just going to conclude that we always look for the cause and effect.  We always ask, why?

Our whole worship is built on the understanding that God is perfect and holy and beyond the reach of imperfect humans.  The ancient people also knew this and had a system of sacrifice to God which enabled them to enter the presence of God.  In our reading from Hebrews we see how God has used this understanding to assure us that we have unlimited access to God.  Jesus gave his life as that sacrifice and through him our communion with God and acceptance to God is unimpeded.  EVERY sin past, present and future has already been atoned for, once and for all.

As far as the East is from the West… this far, he has removed our sins…. And the East and the West never meet.

But, was it due to the sin of Naomi that all this tragedy had happened to her?  Some commentators have suggested that it was that they moved to an unholy place and others have said it was because the sons took foreign women as wives… all these are looking for the cause to equal and make sense of the effect… and all are wrong.

Just as when Jesus was once asked in the Gospel of John chapter 9, “who sinned, this man or his parents that he is blind” – the answer to both that question and the question of why the tragedy happened to Naomi is, neither, but this has happened so that the glory of God can be revealed. 

Our Gospel reading for this weekend is about the greatest commandment.  Mark 12:29-31 “… "The first is, 'Hear, O Israel: the Lord our God, the Lord is one; you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind, and with all your strength.'  The second is this, 'You shall love your neighbour as yourself.' There is no other commandment greater than these."

Jesus was often confronted by people who thought that they kept all the commandments, (stayed in Holy towns, didn’t take foreign wives etc..) but I believe most of those missed these two.  Firstly let’s look at the first one; God is one.  In this land and era of Jesus there were various religions and many so called gods.  So too in Naomi’s time, and in fact the Moabites worshiped the god Chemosh, so you can see how commentators might suggest that Naomi and her family had fallen into sin – and there are Christians today who will say that we as Christians need to be separate from the world and not be tarnished by it.  As a Street Chaplain and resident of planet Earth, I am kind of opposed to this idea.  It certainly is not the way that Jesus lived as he moved among and was merciful to all those who were labelled as “sinful”.  We are told that Jesus ate with tax collectors and sinners.

Our God is one and we are to love him with all our heart, soul, mind and strength.  How does that tangibly look?  I’m glad you asked.  Let’s go back to this story of Naomi.   This beautiful woman had lost husband and sons.  Her only hope really was her two daughter-in-laws and God.  There is an exchange in the story of Naomi and Ruth that tell us a lot.

Firstly, we have the women setting off to go back to Naomi’s homeland, but then Naomi releases the girls from their obligation to her.  Naomi selflessly gave a huge gift…. that of freedom.  Naomi released the girls from their obligation to care for her.  Not only this, but she urged them to go back to their gods.  She was acknowledging that their conversion to being a worshiper of God was potentially superficial and she gave them the respect that we don’t always give others.  The respect to be free to choose to believe and think differently. 

When I look at the respect that Naomi showed the young girls and the freedom that they experienced with her, then I understand why we see that one of those girls freely chose to declare her commitment to her mother-in-law and to God.  Yes, one did return to her people and her gods, but we don’t actually know the rest of her story either.  Ruth, however, more than declared- she vowed - “Where you go, I will go; Where you lodge, I will lodge; your people shall be my people, and your God my God. 

Ruth, has long been known for her example of being a loyal friend, but to leave it there is to underestimate the significance of her story.  It seems logical that Ruth, from a people who worshiped the god Chemosh, somehow acknowledged the magnitude of the one true God in the witness of Naomi.  In the time that Ruth had spent with her family she witnessed and received so much love and respect from Naomi, that even though it seemed that all had gone against them, she still chose to say, your God is my God. 

Ruth had married into this foreign family, probably having very little approval from her own family with their own gods, and then her husband died.  What was this new God, who she now worshipped, doing to her?  This was not the way she should be rewarded for her obedience to God… what was going on?  And what was she to make of this?    This is what many in her position would have been thinking and feeling…. But not Ruth, and I believe the difference, is the love and respect that she had in the relationship with Naomi, who was more than likely the one who instructed her in following God. Somehow, Naomi, in the midst of a foreign culture, was grounded in a relationship with God that spoke volumes to those around her.

 I imagine that Ruth, like the scribe in our Gospel story asking Jesus, may have asked Naomi, “What is the greatest commandment”.

And I imagine that Naomi would have answered just as Jesus did, “, 'Hear, O Israel: the Lord our God, the Lord is one; you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind, and with all your strength.' The second is this, 'You shall love your neighbour as yourself.' There is no other commandment greater than these."

From the way that Naomi loved her neighbour, and accepted her daughter-in-law into her family, Ruth understood these two commandments and freely responded with her own commitment to God and to Naomi.
The Scribe from the Gospel story also added, “--this is much more important than all whole burnt offerings and sacrifices."

When we experience tragedy in our life it is even easier to feel that God is repaying us for our sins-Naomi and Ruth must have felt this, but the love and respect in the relationship of Naomi and Ruth, while an example of that second greatest commandment, is a reflection of the first commandment. 
People turn to God when they are shown love and respect.  To love God with all our strength means a willing sacrificial love for his people.  The two commandments are connected.

We read in Hebrews about the New Covenant where Jesus has declared the way to God permanently open, but in reality God has always been wanting us to come to him in the same way as Ruth, freely and fully – heart, soul, mind and strength.  She was an outsider who showed the greatest example of keeping the two greatest commands – and she was a total outsider who became the integral to the story of our salvation as she became the great grandmother of King David (ancestor of Christ).

I pray that we can all learn from and be inspired by both Naomi and Ruth; By Naomi we learn to love and respect the outsider and pray for their prosperity even if they choose to believe in and worship false gods.  By Ruth we learn to respond genuinely and freely to the love God regardless of our dire circumstances.  And both show us that, in the midst of intense suffering and grief the story isn’t over and the plans and purposes of God are good beyond our wildest imaginings. 

God is Good – All the time.